Slavoj Žižek: What options has the Greek government?


– Cartoon by Paresh

Reading Slavoj Žižek: Thanks to the EU’s villainy, Greece is now under financial occupation – his latest entry on the New Statesman, brings me once again back to the bankruptcy of his dialectical vision. He tells us that the “problem Greece is confronting now is the one of the “Left governmentability”: the hard reality of what it means for the radical Left to govern in the world of global capital. What options has the government?” He mentions Yanis Varoufakis being accused of treason. He mentions Tariq Ali’s Diary: In Athens where Tariq reports the truth in the street back in July:

Conditions in Greece have been horrific: a quarter of a million Greeks applied for humanitarian relief to buy food and help with rent and electricity; the percentage of children living in poverty leaped from 23 per cent in 2008 to 40.5 per cent in 2014 and is now approaching 50 per cent. In March 2015 youth unemployment stood at 49.7 per cent, 300,000 people had no access to electricity and the Prolepsis Institute of Preventive Medicine found that 54 per cent of Greeks were undernourished. Pensions dropped by 27 per cent between 2011 and 2014. Syriza insisted that this constituted collective punishment, and that a new ‘deal’ was needed, one that aimed to bring some improvement to the conditions of everyday life.

Ali mentions Timothy Geithner, “the former US treasury secretary, who mentioned that the attitude of the European finance ministers at the start of the crisis was: ‘We’re going to teach the Greeks a lesson. They lied to us, they suck and they were profligate and took advantage of the whole thing and we’re going to crush them.’ Geithner says that in reply he told them, ‘You can put your foot on the neck of those guys if that’s what you want to do,’ but insisted that investors mustn’t be punished, which meant that the Germans had to underwrite a large chunk of the Greek debt.”

Zizek in his own post goes into his usual philosophical renditions about the Event – a philosophical notion he’s taken from Badiou and made his own, etc. But after a long an seemingly quizzical post that seems to beg the question rather than answer it Zizek offers a futile and somewhat belabored answer:

There is no clear a priori answer here, any decision can only be retroactively justified by its consequences. There is a risk that the Syriza capitulation will turn out to be just that and nothing more, enabling the full reintegration of Greece into EU as a humble bankrupt member, in the same way that there is a risk of Grexit turning into a large scale catastrophe. What one should fear is not only the prospect of the further suffering of the Greek people, but also the prospect of another fiasco which will discredit the Left for years to come, while the surviving Leftists will argue how their defeat proves yet again the perfidiousness of the capitalist system…

Žižek seems to worry less about the human suffering to the actual people of Greece – even though he mentions it as rhetorical gesture, and seems more concerned about the “image” of the Left if Syriza’s government ends in a fiasco, one that he assumes will turn the Left into an self-annihilating artifact of its own dark mythologies of capitalism and its bane. Maybe its time for the Left to give up the ghost and for someone or something else to take up the struggle. Obviously the Left is already passé, a thing of the past, a retroactive dream and utopia that saw its day but is now just a graveyard of lost hopes. Bury the hopes and get out of the grave. Time for people themselves to take up their own struggles and forget the bankrupt Left and their fizzled mythologies of redemption. Time for something else… a Great Refusal whose time has come? Maybe as simple as: “We refuse to work…”. How would the world react to a united Greece who refused to labor for the masters, who would rather help themselves and live or die free than be enslaved to generations of debt? Do you think, then that the oppressed around the planet might just wake up? Come to aid of these desperate people and truly begin a global revolution against the stupidity of a global system that is in the end nothing but a tyrant?

No use going over the post, read it yourself… Thanks to the EU’s villainy, Greece is now under financial occupation.

Cryptosociety: The Dark Economy and Technologies of Freedom


“We will replace insurance companies. We will replace Wall Street. – Joseph Lubin

Under the hood of capitalism flows another world, a dark world of economic counter-insurgents. A realm of noirpreneurs who slip the electronic seeds of an anarchic future of pure freedom beyond the capture systems of global governance. A cryptosociety of dark capitalists who live in the shadow markets outside the global eye. This darker world of the bitcoin and blockchain revolution is unleashing the teeth of a global systemic exit, a techno-secessionism that seeks not only to forget capital’s fractured End Game but to undercut its all too human roots in transparency with utter opaqueness and anonymity.

“What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger,” says Amir Taaki. “Like a hydra, those of us in the community that push for individual empowerment are in an arms race to equip the people with the tools needed for the next generation of digital black markets.” (from Inside the Dark Market by Andy Greenberg) As the blurb on Consensys site envisions the opening out from bitcoins to the larger framework of the global use of blockchain technologies state it: “Blockchain technology and dApps have the ability to decentralize power from existing authorities in business, law, and technology to a broad set of stakeholders. This shift will disrupt current business, economic and social paradigms. Transaction costs and barriers to entry in various industries will be reduced in these industries. The result will likely be an increase in economic exchange and prosperity.”

Taaki argues that he’s merely distributing a program–not running a criminal conspiracy. “I’m just a humble coder,” he says. “Code is a form of expression. You can’t imprison someone for speaking an idea.” Yet, it can be used to counter your so to speak techno-anarchistic neutrality. This open source vision of expression is nothing more than subterfuge, and less than it seems. What’s ironic is that Taaki and those anarchist of the new economy of black markets and terminal exit from the system through a form of techno-secessionism are already being coopted by the very powers they seek to accelerate beyond. Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for this anarchic wave of dissent and techno-secessionism toward alternative sub-cultures and techno-tribalism etc.

Continue reading