Nick Land: Death is Immense

 “Base matter is external and foreign to ideal human aspirations, and it refuses to allow itself to be reduced to the great ontological machines resulting from these aspirations…”

– Georges Bataille

What are those forces below the threshold that escape all those investigative reporters of our darkening humanity? There is an excess that escapes the light, that flows out of the zero sum nullity of a non-space and non-time of which our philosophical harbingers are unaware. What if everything was already contaminated, already part of the base slime of existence? What if it were the most vile, disgusting, sacrilegious, and profane excesses; the most foreign and degrading aspects of existence that reveal the truth we are in need of? “Bataille’s matter is that which must be repressed as the condition of articulation, whereby immanent continuity is vivisected in transcendence (122).” 1

E.M. Cioran whose excesses lead him to a gnostic inversion, one that touches not the a-Cosmic god beyond the cosmos but instead drifts with the slime of this degradation, this catastrophe of the kenoma: our universe of death. Cioran sides with all that is base, all that is excluded, ungrounded, cold, and inhuman. Like Cioran, Georges Bataille, followed the Discordia of Gnostic thought hoping to carry its black “germs of a bizzare but mortal subversion of the ideal” into our modern world. 2 As Benjamin Noys tells us: “Gnosticism is important to Bataille because it leads to ‘the most monstrous dualistic and therefore strangely abased cosmogonies” (502). As his ephebe Nick Land states it:

“Base materialism is the plague of unilateral difference, which is difference that only operates from out of the undifferentiated. … A unilateral difference is the simultaneity of a tendency to separation and a persistence of continuity, which is a thought that cannot be grasped, but only succumbed to in delirium. For any ardent materialism truth is madness” (TA 123-125).

 Following the ancient theurgy Bataille practices a new form of magical practice, he teaches us dip our hands in mud and shit, shape figures of monstrous proportion based on the ‘non-logical difference’ of this strange excess inscribed in the darkest particles and particulates of non-being within the void of the Void. Levi R. Bryant in a new post tell us “don’t track in abstractions”. Nick Land also taught that for Bataille, abstraction keeps us from the delirium of the real:

“The dominant tendencies in philosophy are complicit with ordinary language in their suppression of unilateral differences. Because separation is normally thought of as mutual discontinuity, the world is interpreted as an aggregate of isolated beings, which are extrinsically amalgamated into structures, systems, and societies. Such thinking precludes in principle all possibility of base contact or communion” (TA 124).

And, it is the need for an affective relation, a base contact and communion, an orgy of the senses in the theatre of mater materia that we seek. Base matter is external and foreign to ideal human aspirations, and it refuses to allow itself to be reduced to the great ontological machines resulting from these aspirations. But the psychological process brought to light by Gnosticism had the same impact: it was a question of disconcerting the human spirit and idealism before something base, to the extent that one recognized the helplessness of superior principles. Even becoming and time are contaminated, fractured and “subordinated to a transcendent law, allowing it to be judged, denigrated, and condemned” (TA 129). Lost among our memories, living our tributary deaths, we learn the harshest truth:

“Humanity is a petrified fiction hiding from zero, a purgatorial imprisonment of dissolution, but to be stricken with sanctity is to bask in death like a reptile in the sun. God is dead, but more importantly, God is Death. The beginning of the secret is that death is immense” (TA 131).

1. Nick Land. The Thirst for Annihilation. (Routledge 1992)
2. Benjamin Noys. Georges Bataille’s Base Materialism (Cultural Values Volumes 2 Number 4 1998 499-517) (pdf)

4 thoughts on “Nick Land: Death is Immense

    • When I read the short note at the end of that post I thought: Here we go again with humanities, so to speak, superiority over all other non-human species… I mean listen to the arrogance of this statement:

      “We’re the only animal with the knowledge that we’re part of something else… this knowledge of a physical connection with the rest of life; and it’s not a belief, it’s a knowledge…”

      When someone makes such a bold statement that we’re the only animal with the knowledge… how do we know that? How do we know that other animals have know inkling to their place in the scheme of things? We always want to separate ourselves out, as if we were special, something unique, something else, something better than all other creatures: is this just the final litany of human arrogance; or, is it rather the humanist tradition itself that has become some prevalent in its arrogance that it is now invisible to us? Knowledge the final frontier of humanist arrogance! Human knowledge is two-handed sword: it divides and conquers even as it generates its scientificity of modern marvels: atom bombs, bio-warfare, genocide…. someday there will be an ethical history of this weaponized marvel we call human knowledge: and, I just wonder, if in the end our so to speak human knowledge will founder on the tally sheet of human arrogance!

      Like

      • yes, for a brief post-Derrida moment I thought we had broken the gravitational pull of feeling tuned into (and or having calculated/mapped) the the underlying/overarching Truth of things as they are, but than the all-too-human reasserted itself, may well be a sickness unto death…

        Like

  1. Reblogged this on Emmanuel Storage and commented:
    Beh, è un altro punto di vista.

    Ci tengo a precisare che nelle Upanisad colui che ha dato origine alla manifestazione viene identificato con la Morte-fame e la nascita di ciò che esiste con un sacrificio dell’Essere principiale. Anche nel Cattolicesimo Dio sacrifica se stesso per l’umanità. Nei testi sacri dell’antica India c’è la trinità Brahma-Visnu-Siva, così come nel cattolicesimo c’è Padre-Figlio-Spirito Santo. Brahma portà in oggettività il mondo dei nomi e delle forme, Visnu conserva il mondo e Siva lo riporta allo stato virtuale. Comunque, prosegunedo: la Morte crea un altro Essere, che poi diviene la parola. In principio era il Verbo, e il Verbo era presso Dio….ecc….capite? Il nichilismo è un modo post-moderno per reinterpretare gli antichi miti cosmici….

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s